When
the handshake passes the elbow, it becomes another thing. This is a
considerably prevalent proverb in Chinua Achebe’s works. Now, it can be waxed
into a matter of literary concern. This is in complete disagreement with Susan
Wanjiru’s view on the section of readers corner on Saturday Nation of June 15th.
She voiced an argument that the youth should be allowed to read romantic novels;
for that is usually probably a starting point for them. According to me, this
is arguably false. I will not deny the positivity behind universal and partial
reading of many books; romantic ones included. However, we youths mostly overdo
it. Nora Roberts, Julie Garwood, Danielle Steele; that is what most youths
read.
They
simply cannot afford to stomach reading about literary work written by a black
hand. If you ask them, they will not hesitate to dismiss such works as being
uncivilized. Or rather to put it in friendly terms; being analog (not digital).
Times have moved, and man has absorbed civilization; they will throw in some
more spices into the already cooking pot.
Go
to most libraries in town or street book vendors. And you will testify to what
I am saying. Mentioning the word “library”, what I mostly witnesses with my
colleague students comes to mind in relation to the matter at hand. When they
go to the library, it is something not of this world for them to be interested
in “civilized” books authored by “enlightened” writers. Additionally, it will
be very normal to find only a few indicative borrowing stamps on any
African-authored novel. Needless to say, you will not fail to recognize Western
romantic titles being riddled with a promising number of stamps. Even the
librarian will severally be forced to fix more pieces of paper on the book!
Some
weeks back, I gave out a copy of my short story to my fellow students. They
were supposed to read and then give me back their recommendations. They really
read through it. However, the truth about their recommendations was the
opposite side of my expectations. Most of them dismissed it as “not containing
the degree of civilization and expertise evident in Sheldom’s works.”
So
now tell me; if reading of romantic works of literature among the youth has
gone such far, will the products of the African pen be recognized? Will the
African literary dignity pioneered by Achebe, Ngugi, Ogot stay in place? Or
will it fall apart? For most youths, who to inherit the literary thrones of
past literary kings is of no value to them. This further melts down to the
painful fact that they even never dream of writing (save for “enlightened”
literature). Down the ladder, it is possible that present (and future) writers
will be subjected to literary wilderness, as Taban Lo Liyong would have
described the situation. Who do you write for if the expected readers do not
‘like’ and value literature as an heirloom of African advancement, dignity and
identity among the international community?
This article appeared on the Saturday Nation of 14th September, 2013 - page 28
14th September, 2013
This article appeared on the Saturday Nation of 14th September, 2013 - page 28
14th September, 2013
©2013 Peter
Ngila
Young people should be proud of their roots, and appreciate African writing.
ReplyDelete